Vertigo2903 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

I think this is the greatest shot I've ever seen under pressure. The concetration is amazing. Only Tiger compares. To me Jack and Tiger are the only two players I have ever seen that can visualize shots and know exactly where there gonna hit it. The stamina, focus of both of them is unreal. I think that if you put Jack in his prime with today's equipment against Tiger it would be a toss up.

biunyia (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

yes,even 28, double what he is now.. but he did not have to contend with the likes of watson player palmer trevino and ballesteros who between them won by memory over 35 majors, jack ruled in the golden era of golf.. thats enough for me

golfsurfplay (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

*search "TIGER TEMPO" and become a player**

SmallDannyJW (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Tiger has won 6 in the last 4 years. Bearing in mind in the early part of the 3 years he was still undergoing swing changes, and of course this year he had the knee injury. Its actually quite likely I think that Tiger could win another six in the next four years when he will really be in his prime. That would give him 20 and leave him aged around 37. I think he would still have quite a few majors left in him at that age aswell.

sretsam68 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

22 at the most and not the longevity Nicklaus had (i.e. 25 years). If Tiger drove the ball straighter, I might agree with you. It will be fun to watch the chase, though.

SmallDannyJW (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

We'll see about that. I think its entirely possible Tiger could end up in the mid 20's

itama86 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

best ever brilliant

JSRSvideos (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

check out "jsrsvideos" and watch my golf skillz video

bigpaulothe1st (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

yes jim nantz is a world class presenter.very knowledgable,and seems like a nice guy too.

bigpaulothe1st (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

being able 2 do this seperates the great from the good.